Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

Children Exposed to Substances for Experimentation

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> Conspiracy Central >> Children Exposed to Substances for Experimentation
Jump to post #:
Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Children Exposed to Substances for Experimentation - 11/8/2008 6:07:05 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1393
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
I found this website

http://brasschecktv.com/page/116.html
and


quote:


Pesticides Intentionally Sprayed in Low Income Homes for Experimentation

Bush adminstration supports Program to deliberaretely subject
infants and small children to known toxins.Of course they manipulate poor people into subjecting themselves to poison for money. The Bush administration sinks to even greater lows.

Of course, as ENDGAME shows, these types of studies have gone on for some time-- google "Guinea Pig Children" to learn about foster children and low income black children being subjected to this sick eugenics program.

One of the key points of this program is to "routinely spray pesticides inside the home." Then, a field officer will "visit every 3-6 months for 2 years to conduct tests before and after pesticides [exposure], collecting food and urine samples."


http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/071007_us_nazi_experiments.html

I find it disturbing that the video no longer works.

quote:


This website is dedicated to Guinea Pig Kids - a BBC documentary that exposes how the city of New York has been forcing HIV-Positive children under its supervision to be used as human guinea pigs in tests for experimental AIDS drug trials. (This is a slightly edited version of the complete documentary that was broadcast on Tuesday, 30 November, 2004, at 1930 GMT on BBC Two in the UK. )


http://www.guineapigkids.com/

http://liamscheff.com/content/section/6/31/

quote:


A storm is gathering as EPA's proposed rules for human pesticide experiments have been made public by the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.
...
This is not the first time he has shown bad faith. When his appointment was held up by Senator Barbara Boxer and Senator Bill Nelson.until he suspended the notorious Children's Environmental Exposure Research Study (CHEERS)--that was designed to expose toddlers to pesticide and record their reactions, Johnson agreed only to invite pesticide producers to submit their own study.


http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/05/08/11.php
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=3789
_________________________________________


quote:


Jacklyn Hoerger's job was to treat children with HIV at a New York children's home.

But nobody had told her that the drugs she was administering were experimental and highly toxic.

"We were told that if they were vomiting, if they lost their ability to walk, if they were having diarrhoea, if they were dying, then all of this was because of their HIV infection."

Incarnation Children's Center, Harlem
In fact it was the drugs that were making the children ill and the children had been enrolled on the secret trials without their relatives' or guardians' knowledge.

As Jacklyn would later discover, those who tried to take the children off the drugs risked losing them into care.
...
"Would they have done those experiments with their own children? I doubt it."


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/this_world/4038375.stm

quote:


WASHINGTON, DC, April 11, 2005 (ENS) - A study planned by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that would pay parents to test their childrens' reaction to pesticides nearly proved to be an insurmountable stumbling block for the nominee to the agency's top post.


http://www.organicconsumers.org/school/morecheers041405.cfm

This is partly why I have little faith in the notion that our government knows best. I have good reason to think that our government and its agencies are untrustworthy and that many of their decisions and actions are not intended to be in the best interest of the American people.

quote:


Congress reviewed 22 EPA-related human studies conducted by the pesticide companies and found that test subjects didn't know what they were being exposed to and, in many cases, had no idea why the testing was being done.
...
Congress' concern over EPA's pesticide program was piqued this year when it learned about an agency project that, using $2 million from the chemical industry, would have measured the pesticide consumption of infants in low-income households in Florida.

EPA would have paid the parents every time they sprayed pesticides. Children in the program were to be given teething rings and slices of cheese because researchers knew the youngsters would drop them, then place them in their mouths. In addition, the project was to have given parents about $1,000 and video equipment to monitor and record their children's activities.


http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/05/08/11.php

People need to stop finding it difficult to believe that corporations (including pharmaceutical corporations) are often more interested in their profits than they are in the welfare of the American people. It appears that pesticide companies aren't all that interested in the welfare of the American people, why does it take such a leap of faith to believe pharmaceutical corporations aren't all that interested in the welfare of the American people (and that they aren't all that interested in the safety and effectiveness of their drugs, so long as they provide them with profits. To the extent that they are interested in the safety and effectiveness of their drugs, it's mostly to avoid lawsuits, government sanctions, or loss of sales). The pesticide companies that were responsible for conducting these experiments should be subject to criminal sanctions.

< Message edited by Bettawrekonize -- 11/8/2008 8:30:13 PM >
Post #: 1
RE: Children Exposed to Substances for Experimentation - 11/10/2008 9:05:04 PM   
deliveredarling


Posts: 2169
Joined: 8/30/2007
Status: offline
Eugenics is nothing new to America. We have a horrible history with it. I am not al all surprised by the information you provided. i completely agree with your comments. It is very sad that our country brainwashes our people into believing that the government would never do anything to harm us and that everything they do is in our best interest. And yet, the sleeping continue to dream.....

Do a search on the history of eugenics in America if anyone reading this is not a believer.

_____________________________

"Now no one after lighting a lamp covers it over with a container, or puts it under a bed: but he puts it on a lampstand, in order that those who come in may see the light."
Luke 8:16
http://www.myspace.com/egaip

Come visit
Post #: 2
RE: Children Exposed to Substances for Experimentation - 12/6/2008 9:09:10 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1393
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
I also found this interesting.

Evidence suggests CIA funded experiments at state hospital

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=171210
Post #: 3
RE: Children Exposed to Substances for Experimentation - 12/7/2008 1:52:58 AM   
tacitus

 

Posts: 384
Joined: 5/12/2005
Status: offline
Well, the Bush administration has been gutting the FDA for years, starving it of funding to the point where food inspections are not being carried out as often as they should (fresh spinach anyone?) and drug trials and oversight is actually being partly funded by the drug companies themselves. Talk about conflict of interest.

The question is though, if the FDA doesn't provide effective oversight any more, then who will? Without some government standards and regulation on behalf of the public, then there is nothing to stop drug companies, food companies, or pesticide companies from doing and claiming just about anything they want to -- we will have no way of knowing what's true and what's a dangerous lie. Taking these people to court rarely works, particularly if the plaintiffs are private citizens with limited funding. Time and again, corporations use their deep pockets to delay and defer cases for years -- decades in some cases -- until the plaintiffs run out of money or even die.

The solution not to do away with the FDA -- that would just give corporations free reign (and we just saw what happened with the financial industry when there is no effective oversight) -- the solution is to reform the FDA -- to make it an effective tool in protecting the consumer from harm. We will always need watchdogs to keep an eye on the FDA too, but they also need to be reminded that they work for us -- we're the ones footing the bill after all.
Post #: 4
RE: Children Exposed to Substances for Experimentation - 12/7/2008 2:36:02 AM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1393
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tacitus
The solution not to do away with the FDA -- that would just give corporations free reign (and we just saw what happened with the financial industry when there is no effective oversight)


I agree. We do need the FDA.

quote:


Without some government standards and regulation on behalf of the public, then there is nothing to stop drug companies, food companies, or pesticide companies from doing and claiming just about anything they want to -- we will have no way of knowing what's true and what's a dangerous lie.


I agree.

quote:


Taking these people to court rarely works, particularly if the plaintiffs are private citizens with limited funding. Time and again, corporations use their deep pockets to delay and defer cases for years -- decades in some cases -- until the plaintiffs run out of money or even die.


Our system is badly broken.

quote:


-- the solution is to reform the FDA -- to make it an effective tool in protecting the consumer from harm. We will always need watchdogs to keep an eye on the FDA too, but they also need to be reminded that they work for us -- we're the ones footing the bill after all.


I think one of the main things we need to do is increase FDA transparency and accountability. The highest ranking FDA officials need to be accountable for their actions. I think one of the main problems is the lack of accountability for top ranking FDA officials.
Post #: 5
RE: Children Exposed to Substances for Experimentation - 12/7/2008 3:03:12 AM   
tacitus

 

Posts: 384
Joined: 5/12/2005
Status: offline
You'll get no argument from me on that one. One rule that Obama says he will stick to is to ban those who lobbied for an industry from working in a related area for at least two years. That should mean, for example, that big pharma lobbyists won't immediately be installed at the FDA the next day, hopefully reducing the chances of conflicts of interest.

We won't really know for a while if things will turn around once Bush has gone. Bush isn't making it easy either, doing a number of last minute changes to weaken or even abolish oversight of various harmful pollutants.
Post #: 6
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> Conspiracy Central >> Children Exposed to Substances for Experimentation
Jump to post #:
Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



  Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI